Wages for Sages VS. Salaries for Sudras
My friend Rati is stirring up some much-needed talking points over in the Sampradaya Sun area of the interwebs. A few people are now openly discussing the fact that Srila Prabhupada said that no wages should be paid to temple residents/staff, etc.
A point was raised by Matsya das in his article “Salaries for Sudras” (a rebuttle to “Wages for Sages”)1 that temples are monasteries. Monasteries do not pay salaries.
While writing the Prajalpa Retreat article for The Hing, I got to thinking “why aren’t the japa retreats at a temple? A monastery setting would be the perfect place to be spiritual, no?
Well, in the case of our Krishna consciousness movement, no. Temples are simply not spiritual places.
If you venture into a Buddhist or Catholic monastery, you suddenly feel this deep “energy.”2 It’s heavy and thick and you can’t help but whisper and feel in awe of your surroundings.
But in many, many Hare Krishna temples, it’s chaos or there’s simply nobody there.
Sure, I realize that we basically have no brahmacaris. And the ones we do have are mostly over in India. Sannyasis too (maybe India pays them better). Why not spread it around?
Wouldn’t it be great if you’d enter an ISKCON temple and immediately were sent reeling, back on your heels, nearly floored with awe? Not awe for how dirty and rundown the place is. Not awe for how not a single devotee will acknowledge you (unless you’re Indian-bodied and have a fat wallet). But awe for Krishna. Awe for the devotion of the monks. Awe at how the whole thing makes you want to be a devotee too.
But sadly, at the present state, that cannot happen. The monks don’t really exist. The temples are simply whorehouses pimping out the deities with “puja thalis” and “maha kalasha.” The temple residents are temple employees because it seems like nobody will do service for the sake of bhakti.
And if this is brought up, you receive a chorus of “but prabhu, if we did not do this, how would we keep the temple open?” What that really means is “if we did not do this, how would I get paid? I’d have to get a real job!”
It’s amazingly simple and easy to not really care if some temple employee has to get a real job. And it’s getting easier and easier to not really care if they have to close a temple. Or even most of the temples. If they’re not spiritual places of pilgrimage (and I mean real spirituality, not this weird little spiritual materialism plague that’s infested most of North American ISKCON) let them close before they do any more damage.
And in their place, there will always be a core group of dedicated devotees who are willing to preach, distribute prasadam and books. These are the devotees that hold the future of ISKCON and Krishna consciousness, not some well-paid GBCs. The temples may close, but Krishna consciousness is always open.


