Dear Pandu and Corey – Have you people gone completely insane?
Sunday morning. I woke up and checked out PlanetISKCON only to be greeted with the amazingly nasty description of Hugh Heffner’s sex life (Ugh!) as posted by Pandu dasa via Bhakta Corey’s blog of ever-changing and wildly irrational rantings (here and here).
The main point seems to be that if you change the definition of homosexuality to mean “promiscuous sex” then a whole lot more people are gay than before.
Since this argument really makes no sense at all, I’ll not refute it and just allow it to defeat itself.
The post then goes on to bring “Illuminati bankers” into it. They used Playboy Magazine to destroy the institution of marriage. See, Illuminati bankers “own the major cartels and control the media through advertising.” I think I sort of dozed off there because blaming “Illuminati bankers” for stuff is almost as logical as changing the definition of homosexuality to prove your point.
And what is the point? I think it’s that all porn is gay porn. To prove the point, they use their definition of “gay.” It’s convenient and fun!
By the way, all cookies are chocolate chip cookies because I’ve just changed the definition of “walnut” to mean “tiny bits of chocolate.” Same goes for snickerdoodles. The illuminati bakers are controlling the Keebler elves and the lunatic is on the grass.
Pandu, seriously now. You really believe this stuff? That illuminati bankers are destroying marriage via Hugh Heffner? As far as conspiracy theories go, that’s quite a stretch.
And you do realize that you can’t actually change the definition of words to prove a point, right? That’s typically considered bad logic and you pretty much automatically lose your argument. Bring the Illuminati into it and you not only lose, but it’s pretty much time to be fitted with a straight jacket.
